18.55pm tonight

?

ohhhh thats low

Doesn't improve their vision though smart arse.

Most people who are registered blind aren't totally blind. No idea about Stevie or Ray though.

I meant full on blind, not the half-way house impaired vision type who enter the special olympics so they can cheat and run the rule over the real blindies.

Do people who have been blind from birth have dreams?

Vision.

3. an experience in which a personage, thing, or event appears vividly or credibly to the mind, although not actually present.




is saw that after I'd posted..

And your source is? Honestly, did University teach you nothing?

Wanker.

Could dream about souds they hear perhaps?

spot on

ok I'll ignore how laws effect their societies and instead explain a little about Ha'Torah.

There are countless documents like the Mesha Stele which confirm Torah stories (and the existence of Torah scrolls), but our earliest Torah stories are about 2300 years old, we are missing 1000 years of history.

What we do know is that the earlier scrolls we find are incredibly similar to the Torah we read from today... but I can't stand here and lie and say that we have the complete scroll that Moshe scribed....

We know Torah scrolls existed over 3000 years ago, we have confirmation of the Torah legends, locations, characters, practises & the scrolls themselves.... But as to be expected we don't have many millenia old preserved scrolls.

andy are you not more concerned that andy supports your perspective.

I'll leave the andy's to work out which one I'm insulting

The only consideration regarding 'source' (sic) for people on here is red or brown..

incidently miss... http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/vision

I notice you picked the third definition rather than:

1. the act or power of sensing with the eyes; sight.

depends how you look at it

well i spell my name ANDI so it cant be me


but so what we both think the same that religion is a load of bollox that wastes time, effort, lives, and resources! in the name of a greater power that consistently dis-proves it's self with contradiction and ideological inaccuracies the fact you don't agree is of no importance nor interest of me or Andy for that matter it just says to me your a mug for believing this shit

You got me andi (you realise the male spelling is with a y), I'm a mug.

so in fact you are in exactly the same space as the evolutionists you believe something to be true based on the evidence available but given the time which has passed it's impossible to prove it was not invented by some random bloke avin a larf

It backed up my point so I'm taking it as a cast-iron definition that can't be deviated from.